Board Characteristics Impact on the Firm Performance in the Indian Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett25191022

Keywords:

Board Characteristics, Board Size, Firm Performance, Tobin’s Q, Shares Pledged, Ownership Concentration, India

Abstract

The research aims to determine the impact of the board characteristics on the firm performance for 348 firms of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) 500 Index listed on the National Stock Exchange of India for the period 2012-2018 using (OLS) Ordinary Least Square (FEM) Fixed Effect Model and more robust (GMM) Generalized Method of Moments regression techniques. GMM regression technique also controls for the endogeneity as well as heteroscedasticity and heterogeneity in panel data. Further, the moderating effects of market capitalization are also observed considering the impact of board characteristics on the firm performance using the interaction effects technique. Lastly, the ideal board size was determined based on the classification of market capitalization including small, mid and large market cap. Board characteristics including board size and percentage of shares held by the promoters have a positive significant impact on the firm performance while the percentage of shares pledged by the promoters has a negative significant impact on the firm performance. The results show that market capitalization moderates the relationship between board characteristics and firm performance. Findings also suggest an ideal board size of 8 for mid-cap firms and a range of 7-18 for large-cap firms which show a similar result to the Kotak Committee Report (2017) recommendations with the ideal board size being a minimum of 6 directors on the board. The results cannot be generalized as only the manufacturing and services (excluding financial) industries are taken into account, but the results can be applied to the abovesaid industry sectors.

 

CITE THIS PAPER:

Naim, Hamza; Aziz, Tariq (2022). "Board Characteristics impact on the Firm Performance in the Indian Context" Journal of World Economy: Transformations & Transitions (JOWETT) 2(05):19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett25191022

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Hamza NAIM, Faculty of Management Studies and Research, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

Hamza Naim, is a research scholar in the area of finance under the supervision of Dr. Tariq Aziz. He has a NET (National Eligibility Test) qualification and his research interest include corporate finance and corporate governance.

Tariq AZIZ, Faculty of Management Studies and Research, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

Tariq Aziz, has a Ph.D. in Finance, an MBA, and a Bachelor degree in Commerce from Aligarh Muslim University. He was a recipient of Junior (JRF) and Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) of UGC. He got the Best Paper Award at the 7th Doctoral Colloquium-2013 at IIM-Ahmedabad and the "Special Mention Paper Award" at PAN-IIM World Management Conference (WMC) 2019. His research interests lie in asset pricing and behavioural finance and has various publications.

References

Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: The case of Jordan. SN Business & Economics, 1(12), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00167-1

Aziz, Tariq & Naim, Hamza (2020) International Conclave on Globalizing Indian Thought IIM Kozhikode, India, 26. https://forms.iimk.ac.in/research/git2020/GIT2020_Conference_Proceedings.pdf

Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2010.05.001

Barnhart, S. W., Marr, M. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1994). Firm performance and board composition: Some new evidence. Managerial and decision economics, 15(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090150407

Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. J. CorP. l., 27, 231. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jcorl27&div=18&id=&page=

Chen, Y., & Hu, S. Y. (2007). The controlling shareholder's personal leverage and firm performance. Applied Economics, 39(8), 1059-1075.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500462004

Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of financial economics, 87(1), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006

Cheng, S., Evans, J. H., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2008). Board size and firm performance: the moderating effects of the market for corporate control. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31(2), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0074-3

Cho, D. S., & Kim, J. (2007). Outside directors, ownership structure and firm profitability in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00557.x

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of management review, 28(3), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of financial economics, 48(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8

Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121

Haldar, A., & Nageswara Rao, S. V. D. (2013). Governance practices of Indian firms: an empirical analysis. The Empirical Economic Letters, 12(9), 975-984. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2309505

Haldar, A., & Rao, S. N. (2011). Empirical study on ownership structure and firm performance. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 4(2), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220110203

Heugens, P. P., & Van Essen, M. (2009). Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 481-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9109-0

Iwu-Egwuonwu, D., & Chibuike, R. (2010). Some empirical literature evidence on the effects of independent directors on firm performance. Ronald Chibuike, Some Empirical Literature Evidence on the Effects of Independent Directors on Firm Performance (August 4, 2010). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1653306

Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x

Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1

Johl, S. K., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B. J. (2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 239-243. DOI: 10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.187

Khatib, S. F., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021a). Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 985-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2665

Khatib, S. F., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A., Yahaya, I. S., & Owusu, A. (2021b). Global trends in board diversity research: A bibliometric view. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1194

Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside directors, corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737

Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 13(1), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431

Kuznetsov, P., & Muravyev, A. (2001). Ownership concentration and firm performance in Russia: the case of blue chips of the stock market. Acta Oeconomica, 51(4), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.1556/aoecon.51.2000-2001.4.2

Kao, L.F. & A. Chen (2007). Directors’ share collateralization, earnings management and firm performance. https://doi.org/10.6538/TAR.2007.0602.02

Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 13(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002

Malagila, J. K., Zalata, A. M., Ntim, C. G., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). Corporate governance and performance in sports organisations: The case of UK premier leagues. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 2517-2537. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1918

Li, M., Liu, C., & Scott, T. (2019). Share pledges and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 55, 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.001

Mohanty, P. (2003). Institutional investors and corporate governance in India. National Stock Exchange of India Research Initiative Paper, (15).https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.353820

Ntim, C. G. (2015). Board diversity and organizational valuation: Unravelling the effects of ethnicity and gender. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(1), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9283-4

Ntim, C. G., & Osei, K. A. (2011). The impact of corporate board meetings on corporate performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 83-103. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/aref/article/view/86950

Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., & Danbolt, J. (2015). Board size, corporate regulations and firm valuation in an emerging market: a simultaneous equation approach. International Review of Applied Economics, 29(2), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2014.983048

O’connell, V., & Cramer, N. (2010). The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland. European Management Journal, 28(5), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2009.11.002

Ouyang, C., Xiong, J., & Fan, L. (2019). Do insiders share pledging affect executive pay-for-performance sensitivity? International Review of Economics & Finance, 63, 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.10.019

Pande, S., & Ansari, V. A. (2013). A note on the efficacy of the current corporate governance regulations in India. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2333023

Prabowo, M., & Simpson, J. (2011). Independent directors and firm performance in family-controlled firms: evidence from Indonesia. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 25(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2011.01276.x

Rajagopalan, N., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance reforms in China and India: Challenges and opportunities. Business Horizons, 51(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.005

Saibaba, M. D., & Ansari, V. A. (2012). Impact of board size: an empirical study of companies listed in BSE 100 index. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220120202

Sánchez‐Ballesta, J. P., & García‐Meca, E. (2007). A meta‐analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 879-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00604.x

Sarhan, A. A., Ntim, C. G., & Al‐Najjar, B. (2019). Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance, and executive pay. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(2), 761-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1690

Sarkar, J. (2009). Board independence & corporate governance in India: Recent trends & challenges ahead. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 576-592. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27768232#metadata_info_tab_contents

Sarkar, J., Sarkar, S., & Sen, K. (2012). A corporate governance index for large listed companies in India. Available at SSRN 2055091. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2055091

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 53(1), 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5

Varottil, U., & Naniwadekar, M. (2018). The Stakeholder Responsibility of Corporate Boards. Corporate Governance, (20). https://www.independentdirectorsdatabank.in/img/partners/617fc13682138.pdf

Wang, J., Guthrie, D., & Xiao, Z. (2012). The rise of SASAC: Asset management, ownership concentration, and firm performance in China's capital markets. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 253-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00236.x

Wang, K., & Shailer, G. (2015). Ownership concentration and firm performance in emerging markets: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12048

Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005

Wooldridge, J. M. (2001). Applications of generalized method of moments estimation. Journal of Economic perspectives, 15(4), 87-100. DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.4.87.

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-10-05