Profitability, Managerial Ownership, and Audit Committee on Stock Returns in Indonesian Commercial Banks

Masrurahtul Ainie  ZAMAN; Sri Utami  ADY

doi:10.52459/jowett25211122

Authors

Masrurahtul Ainie ZAMAN Faculty of Economics and Business, University Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-056X
Sri Utami ADY Faculty of Economics and Business, University Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-4383

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett25211122

Keywords:

Profitability (ROA), Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee, Stock Return, Indonesia

Abstract

Profitability shows the managerial ability to generate profits for the company. A high level of profitability gives a signal to investors about the company's better prospects in the future, thereby attracting investors and ultimately increasing stock prices. Managerial ownership also shows investors that managers are concerned about the company's development, so investors will assume that managers will work better if they are also shareholders. Meanwhile, the audit committee is in charge of internal supervision for the company. This study analyses profitability, managerial ownership, and audit committee to stock return in Indonesian commercial banks during the Covid-19 pandemic. The population of this study is companies in the banking sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2020. Sampling was done through the purposive sampling technique, thus obtaining 44 companies as research samples. The analysis technique used multiple linear analyses. The results of this study indicate that profitability has a significant negative effect on stock returns. It could have happened due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which caused all stocks to drop drastically. In contrast, managerial ownership and the audit committee have no partial effect on stock returns because managerial ownership has a minimal influence. So, it is considered less effective in influencing administrative actions in decision making and the audit committee, which does not affect whichever several auditors will not affect the company's performance through the total assets or profits that the company will obtain. This study implies that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the variables studied have a minimal effect on stock returns because psychological factors influence stock prices in the form of investor panic, which makes banking sector stocks have low and even negative returns.

CITE THIS PAPER:

Zaman, Masrurahtul A.; Ady, Sri U. (2022). "Profitability, Managerial Ownership, and Audit Committee on Stock Returns in Indonesian Commercial Banks" Journal of World Economy: Transformations & Transitions (JOWETT) 2(05):21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett25211122

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ady, S. U. (2015). Manajemen Psikologi dalam Investasi Saham, Kajian Fenomenologi dalam Sentuhan Behavioral Finance (Monika Bendatu (ed.); 1st ed.). CV. Andi Offset. https://doi.org/http://repository.unitomo.ac.id/id/eprint/231

Ady, S. U. (2018). The Cognitive and Psychological Bias in Investment Decision-Making Behavior: (Evidence From Indonesian Investor’s Behavior). Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i1.2092

Ady, S. U., Sudarma, M., Salim, U., & Aisyah, S. (2013). Psychology’s Factors of Stock Buying and Selling Behavior in Indonesia Stock Exchange (Phenomenology Study of Investor Behavior in Surabaya). IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-0731122

Ady, S. U., Tyas, A. M., Farida, I., & Gunawan, A. W. (2020). Immediate and Expected Emotions toward Stock Returns through Overconfidence and Cognitive Dissonance: The Study of Indonesian Investor Behavior. PalArch’s Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(3), 1140–1165. https://doi.org/https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/238/241

Agoes, S., & Trisnawati Estralita. (2016). Akuntansi Perpajakan (3rd ed.). Salemba Empat.

Ang, R. (1997). Buku Pintar Pasar Modal Indonesia (The Intelligent Guide to Indonesian Capital Market). Mediasoft Indonesia.

Devinta, T. P., Titisari, K. H., & Wijayanti, A. (2020). PROFITABILITAS, KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, DAN KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP RETURN SAHAM (Perusahaan Industri Barang Konsumsi Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Periose 2014-2018). Jurnal Investasi, 6(1), 16–25.

Dewi, L. S., & Abundanti, N. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Kepemilikan Institusional Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 8(10), 6099. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2019.v08.i10.p12

Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Square Regression. Biometrika, 38, 159 – 177.

Fahmi, I. (2016). Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan: Teori dan Soal Jawab. Alfabeta.

Farag, H., Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (2018). Corporate Governance In Islamic Banks: New Insights For Dual Board Structure And Agency. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 54, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002

Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hirawan, D. S., Azib Asroi, & Hasanah, E. N. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional dan Komite Audit Terhadap Return Saham. Prosiding Manajemen Seminar Penelitian Sivitas Akademika Unisba, 6(2), 1105–1111. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29652

Jannah, I. R., & Khoiruddin, M. (2017). Peran financial distress memediasi kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial terhadap return saham. Management Analysis Journal, 6(3), 262–273. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/maj/article/view/18876

Jensen, M., C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance Economic, 3(4), 305–360. https://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/jensen-meckling.pdf

Jogiyanto, H. (2017). Teori portofolio dan analisis investasi (edisi Kesebelas). In Yogyakarta: BPFE (8th ed.). BPFE.

Kasmir (2017). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (E. Pertama (ed.)). PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Keputusan Bapepam No. Kep-29/PM/2004. (2004). Keptusan Bapepam No. Kep-29/PM/2004 tentang Pembentukan dan Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kerja Komite Audit.

Munawir. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (2nd ed.). Liberty.

Rachmad W. N., Purwanto, N., & Dianawati, E. (2016). ANALISIS KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL, DEWAN KOMITE AUDIT, DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP RETURN SAHAM PADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TERDAFTAR DALAM BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI). Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 4(2). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/jrma/article/view/1365

Roiyah, M., & Priyadi, M. P. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Good Corporate Governace terhadap Return Saham Syariah. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akutansi (JIRA), 8(6), 1–18. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/2140

Salipadang, W., Jao, R., & Beauty. (2017). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Return Saham. Dinamika Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 6(1), 83–101. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe9/article/view/5946/1814

Sari, A. N., Suharti, T., & Nurhayati, I. (2020). Pengaruh Roa, Roe Dan Eps Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan. Manager : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 3(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.32832/manager.v3i1.3834

SPSS. (2022). Statistical Product and Service Solutions - SPSS Analysis.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, & Susanto, A. (2015). Cara Mudah Belajar SPSS dan LISREL Teori dan Aplikasi untuk Analisis Data Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Suliyanto. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk Skripsi, Tesis, & Disertasi. Andi Offset.

Zahro, N. I. (2012). Pengaruh Rasio Profitabilitas Terhadap Return Saham Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Universitas Muria Kudus. https://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/Saintek/article/view/379